So, Leica released another M lens, called the Leica Noctilux-M 35/1.2 ASPH. - for the facile price of 102.000 SEK or $9650

Astronomical prices - but it all depends on what you are comparing it with. There are groups of 'people', who probably find the price to be merely pocket money.

Sharp ! (it better be)

It seems to be a very well corrected and sharp lens - while also being unusual small for being such a bright lens. At the same time you do get quite a lot of vignetting in the corners.

For me this is not a lens to strive for - simply because I already have the Leica Summilux-M 35/1.4 ASPH FLE from 1012 - which I think is a marvel. The price on that one, has increased steeply since 2012 - like all other Leica M lenses have done, too.

The Noctilux 35/1.2 ASPH. is only 1/3 stop brighter compared to the Summilux 35.

So, there is that.

Other very bright quality 1.2 lenses

Speaking of bright lenses. For my Olympus system, i have the M.Zuiko 17mm ƒ1.2 PRO lens, which iequivalent to a 35mm ƒ1.2 lens (with ƒ2.4 bokeh). It might not be totally comparable with the Leica due to that the Olympus is made for a smaller sensor - but ƒ1.2 is ƒ1.2 still.

Olympus ƒ1.2 lenses are true optical marvels (equivalent to 35mm, 50mm, 90mm ƒ 1.2) Absolutely fantastic sharp lenses, at the same time producing gorgeous background blur. Altogether, these three elevate the Micro Four Third camera platform to a new heights. The prices are still highly affordable, and far away from Leica prices.

Just saying.

Long time since I have stopped buying Leica lenses

That flair has cracked and vanished. Also worth of notice is, that there are plenty of excellent lenses for Leica M cameras; especially from Voigtländer but also from many other Chinese producers. You have to investigate which one are the marvels vs the lemons.

There are definitely some really good lenses among them - for a price which is a fraction that of Leica.